Five professionals approved the model as appropriate at a high level¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Professional assessment of the qualified model yielded an overall average arithmetic mean of 4.04 (S.D. 0.92), a high level of approval. → Changpetch & Seechaliao 2020
Evidence¶
Changpetch & Seechaliao 2020¶
Changpetch & Seechaliao. (2020). The Propose of an Instructional Model Based on STEM Education Approach for Enhancing the Information and Communication Technology Skills for Elementary Students in Thailand. International Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n1p69
q2 · i? · design · r2
Phase II assessment by five professionals using an evaluate form. Table 2 reports element means from 3.60 (principles, S.D. 1.67) to 4.33 (measurement and evaluation), all rated high; the discussion states the "Overall average presented arithmetic mean was 4.05".
"Overall average presented arithmetic mean was 4.05 and the standard deviation was 0.92, which means that the model was approved at a high level."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Eleven experts rated the tentative STEM-ICT instructional model as appropriate at a high level — related
- Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. = 0.27), with learning achievement output rated High — related
- Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05) — related
- Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning process via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.82, S.D. = 0.40) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stem-ict-model-professional-approval-high |
title |
Five professionals approved the model as appropriate at a high level |
description |
Five professionals approved the model as appropriate at a high level |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
recheck_by |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — changpetch-seechaliao-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.