Students rank lower as LA users among institutions that already implemented LA than among preparing or interested institutions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among institutions that had implemented LA, students were the fifth most frequent users, whereas students ranked second among preparing and interested groups. → Tsai 2020
Evidence¶
Tsai 2020¶
Tsai, Yi-Shan, et al. (2020). Learning Analytics in European Higher Education – Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Survey findings (Figure 3, n=45) show "teaching staff and tutors" consistently received the highest votes across the three respondent groups, with students dropping in rank among implementers.
"when asked about with which stakeholders the institution was sharing or would share the results of LA, “teaching staff and tutors” consistently received the highest votes across three groups of respondents: those who had implemented LA, those who were preparing to implement LA, and those who were interested in adopting LA."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- VLE/LMS, assessment scores, Student Information Systems, and student surveys are the most frequently chosen data sources for LA — related
- European HE institutions perceive LA primarily as a tool to enhance teaching and institutional management, with teaching and support staff as main users — related
- Learning and teaching support units are the most involved and leading stakeholders in LA adoption, with students minimally involved — related
- Existing components in learning management systems are the most frequently chosen LA tools and software — related
- Top-ranked program choices differed by student background: low-performing students were nearly three times as likely as high-performing students to rank a charter program first, and IB programs were most popular among high-performing students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.