Claims

TBL is associated with higher theoretical knowledge scores than LBL in Chinese neurology education (SMD = 1.16)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Compared to traditional LBL, TBL was related to higher theoretical knowledge scores in Chinese neurology education. → Fu Jie 2026

Evidence

Fu Jie 2026

Fu Jie, Chen Xiu, Li Jinglun, Peng Lilei. (2026). TBL alone or combined with other teaching methods for neurology education in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09468-1

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 15 RCTs with 1237 students (619 TBL, 618 LBL) using a random-effects model due to heterogeneity (I2 = 89%). The pooled estimate favored TBL: "SMD = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.54, p < 0.00001".

"The results indicated that compared to traditional LBL, TBL was related to higher theoretical knowledge scores (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.54, p < 0.00001) (Fig. 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.