Claims

TBL significantly increases students' learning attitude compared with LBL (pooled SMD = 3.23)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In four studies reporting questionnaire-based learning attitude, the pooled TBL effect versus LBL was significant (SMD = 3.23, 95% CI: 2.27–4.20). → Chen Minjian 2018

Evidence

Chen Minjian 2018

Chen Minjian, Ni Chunhui, Hu Yanhui, Wang Meilin, Liu Lu, Ji Xiaoming, Chu Haiyan, Wu Wei, Lu Chuncheng, Wang Shouyu, Wang Shoulin, Zhao Liping, Li Zhong, Zhu Huijuan, Wang Jianming, Xia Yankai, Wang Xinru. (2018). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects pooling of learning attitude outcomes from questionnaire surveys in 4 of the 13 included studies (505 subjects). The pooled effect was "SMD = 3.23, 95% CI: 2.27–4.20" with high heterogeneity (I2 = 92.1%).

"for learning attitude, SMD = 3.23, 95% CI: 2.27–4.20, I2 = 92.1%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.