TBL significantly increases students' learning skill compared with LBL (pooled SMD = 2.70)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 In five studies reporting learning skill, the pooled TBL effect versus LBL was significant in a random-effects model (SMD = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.33–4.07). → Chen Minjian 2018

Evidence¶

Chen Minjian 2018¶

Chen Minjian, Ni Chunhui, Hu Yanhui, Wang Meilin, Liu Lu, Ji Xiaoming, Chu Haiyan, Wu Wei, Lu Chuncheng, Wang Shouyu, Wang Shoulin, Zhao Liping, Li Zhong, Zhu Huijuan, Wang Jianming, Xia Yankai, Wang Xinru. (2018). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects pooling of self-directed learning skill outcomes from questionnaire surveys in 5 of the 13 included studies (607 subjects). The pooled effect was "SMD = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.33–4.07" with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 97.4%).

"for learning skill, SMD = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.33–4.07, I2 = 97.4%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• TBL significantly increases students' learning attitude compared with LBL (pooled SMD = 3.23) — related
• TBL significantly increases medical students' theoretical examination scores compared with LBL in Chinese medical education (pooled SMD = 2.46) — related
• TBL students achieve significantly higher post-test final scores than LBL students in medical education — related
• TBL is associated with higher theoretical knowledge scores than LBL in Chinese neurology education (SMD = 1.16) — related
• In nonrandomized studies of undergraduate (5-year program) students, TBL showed a large positive effect on examination scores with reduced heterogeneity (SMD = 4.39) — related