Claims

A three-session EBM and critical appraisal course produced a highly statistically significant overall pre-post score difference (Z-score=-3.398, P=0.001) among medical students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A three-session course for 4th-year medical students produced a highly statistically significant overall difference between pre- and post-test scores (Z-score=-3.398, P=0.001). → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q3 · i? · review · r3

Pre-post evaluation of a three-session EBM and critical appraisal course for 4th-year medical students (n=319) in the US. The review reports "Overall difference between pre- and post-tests scores was highly statistically significant (Z-score=-3.398, P=0.001)".

"Overall difference between pre- and post-tests scores was highly statistically significant (Z-score=-3.398, P=0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.