Claims

An online EBM course integrated with clinical clerkships significantly improved question development, sources of evidence, and search strategies scores among medical students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? An online EBM course with six didactic modules run concurrently with clinical clerkships significantly improved pre-post scores for question development (3.73 to 4.13), sources of evidence (3.96 to 4.53), and search strategies (5.07 to 5.86), all P<0.001. → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-post evaluation of an online EBM course (six online didactic modules and sessions) run concurrently with clinical clerkships for 3rd-year medical students (n=139) in the US. Table 2 reports "Question development: 3.73 (1.27) vs. 4.13 (1.39), P<0.001" plus significant gains in sources of evidence and search strategies.

"Question development: 3.73 (1.27) vs. 4.13 (1.39), P<0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.