Claims

Exposure to a 14-session EBM intervention was associated with higher confidence in critical appraisal skills among medical students (M5 EBM 17.1 vs. M5 non-EBM 8.4, P<0.001)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Confidence in critical appraisal skills differed across exposure groups: 5th-year students exposed to the intervention scored 17.1 (3.6) versus 8.4 (5.7) for 5th-year students not exposed, and 11.7 (6.3) for 4th-year students not yet exposed (P<0.001). → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q3 · i? · review · r3

Controlled trial of 14 two-hour weekly EBM sessions for medical students (n=289) in Mexico, comparing exposed and non-exposed year groups. Confidence in critical appraisal skills was 17.1 (3.6) for exposed 5th-years versus 8.4 (5.7) for non-exposed 5th-years, P<0.001.

"Confidence in critical appraisal skills: mean (SD) M4=11.7 (6.3) vs. M5 non-EBM=8.4 (5.7) vs. M5 EBM=17.1 (3.6) vs. M6=16.8 (4), P<0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.