The three-way group × time × practice interaction was significant for explicitness but not duration: MCS explicitness rose more in the SRL-AIDE group while KC explicitness rose more in the comparison group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 The three-way interaction was significant for explicitness (F(1,68) = 7.07, p = .010, ηp2 = .09) but not for duration (p = .115). → Orna Heaysman 2026
q2 i2 In the SRL-AIDE group MCS explicitness increased more than KC, while in the comparison group KC increased more than MCS. → Orna Heaysman 2026
Evidence¶
Orna Heaysman 2026¶
Orna Heaysman, Bracha Kramarski. (2026). Authentic evidence from the 'SRL-AIDE' simulative environment on explicitness and duration of in-class SRL teaching practices. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09787-2
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
Three-way mixed MANOVA on video-coded lessons; the explicitness three-way interaction reached significance ("ηp2 = .09") while duration did not (p = .115). Bonferroni follow-ups showed SRL-AIDE gains significant for both practices (p < .001), comparison gains significant only for KC (p = .042).
"significant interaction of group, time and practice for the expliciteness but not for the duration [F(1,68) = 7.07, p = .010, ηp2 = .09; F(1,68) = 2.55, p = .115, ηp2 = .04, respectively]. The significant three-way interaction indicates that the explicitness level of each practice increased differently in each group: the MCS increased more than the KC in the SRL-AIDE group, while the KC increased more than the MCS in the comparison group"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- KC lesson duration increased significantly only in the SRL-AIDE group (d = 1.14), not in the comparison group (d = 0.12) — related
- In the SRL-AIDE group, MCS explicitness showed a larger pre-post gain (d = 2.08) than KC explicitness (d = 1.03), and SRL-AIDE's KC gain exceeded the comparison group's (d = 1.03 vs d = 0.31) — related
- Teachers in the SRL-AIDE program showed greater pre-to-post gains than a comparison group in both the explicitness and duration of their in-class SRL practices — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
three-way-interaction-explicitness-not-duration |
title |
The three-way group × time × practice interaction was significant for explicitness but not duration: MCS explicitness rose more in the SRL-AIDE group while KC explicitness rose more in the comparison group |
description |
The three-way group × time × practice interaction was significant for explicitness but not duration: MCS explicitness rose more in the SRL-AIDE group while KC explicitness rose more in the comparison group |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — orna-heaysman-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.