Teachers in the SRL-AIDE program showed greater pre-to-post gains than a comparison group in both the explicitness and duration of their in-class SRL practices¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 The SRL-AIDE group had higher gains than the comparison group in both explicitness levels and duration of MCS and KC practices (group × time interaction, ηp2 = .57 omnibus). → Orna Heaysman 2026
q2 i3 The group × time interaction was significant separately for explicitness (ηp2 = .40) and duration (ηp2 = .51). → Orna Heaysman 2026
Evidence¶
Orna Heaysman 2026¶
Orna Heaysman, Bracha Kramarski. (2026). Authentic evidence from the 'SRL-AIDE' simulative environment on explicitness and duration of in-class SRL teaching practices. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09787-2
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Three-way mixed MANOVA (group × time × practice) on video-coded lessons of 70 elementary teachers in a quasi-experimental pre/post design. The omnibus group × time interaction was significant, "ηp2 = .57", with separate effects for explicitness and duration.
"the two-way interaction of group and time was significant, F(2,67) = 45.12, p < .001, ηp2 = .57. Examining each of the dependent variables separately indicated significant interaction of group and time for both expliciteness and duration [F(1,68) = 45.26, p < .001, ηp2 = .40; F(1,68) = 71.25, p < .001, ηp2 = .51, respectively] indicating that the SRL-AIDE group had higher gains than the comparison group in both explicitness levels and duration."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- KC lesson duration increased significantly only in the SRL-AIDE group (d = 1.14), not in the comparison group (d = 0.12) — related
- In the SRL-AIDE group, MCS explicitness showed a larger pre-post gain (d = 2.08) than KC explicitness (d = 1.03), and SRL-AIDE's KC gain exceeded the comparison group's (d = 1.03 vs d = 0.31) — related
- The three-way group × time × practice interaction was significant for explicitness but not duration: MCS explicitness rose more in the SRL-AIDE group while KC explicitness rose more in the comparison group — related
- Primary teachers who participated in the iSELF professional development program showed significantly higher explicit SRL strategy instruction at post-test than control teachers — related
- Teachers typically provide only little explicit support for SRL in their classrooms — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
srl-aide-greater-gains-explicitness-duration |
title |
Teachers in the SRL-AIDE program showed greater pre-to-post gains than a comparison group in both the explicitness and duration of their in-class SRL practices |
description |
Teachers in the SRL-AIDE program showed greater pre-to-post gains than a comparison group in both the explicitness and duration of their in-class SRL practices |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — orna-heaysman-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.