Trained teams specify intended goal changes and timelines far more often than untrained teams (95.8% and 96.8% vs 4.2% and 3.2%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Trained teams specified intended changes (95.8%) and expectations for when to see changes (96.8%) more than untrained teams (4.2% and 3.2%, respectively). → Todd 2019
Evidence¶
Todd 2019¶
Todd, A. W., Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Preston, A. I., Cusumano, D., & Algozzine, K. (2019). A Descriptive Study of School-Based Problem-Solving. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617733717
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive direct-observation analysis of 196 problems discussed by 38 elementary school teams in the wait-list controlled TIPS study. Overall, goals and timelines were discussed infrequently, but the printed percentages show trained teams specified intended changes and timelines far more often than untrained teams; no inferential test is printed for this contrast.
"Desired goals (36.7%) and timelines for achieving goals (31.6%) were discussed infrequently; however, trained teams specified intended changes (95.8%) and expectations for when to see changes (96.8%) more than untrained teams (4.2%, 3.2%, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- TIPS-trained school teams define problems with greater precision (who, what, where, when, why) than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams more often include timelines and implementation-integrity details (what, when, who) in solution action plans than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams use more reward elements and fewer system-change elements, and fewer solution steps overall, than untrained teams — related
- After TIPS professional development, teams were more likely to define problems with precision, set implementation goals, and document implementation integrity and summative evaluation decisions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.