Trained teams more often include timelines and implementation-integrity details (what, when, who) in solution action plans than untrained teams¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? For new problems, trained teams identified a timeline and discussed implementation integrity (what, when, and who) more than untrained teams, while both groups similarly identified a person responsible. → Todd 2019
Evidence¶
Todd 2019¶
Todd, A. W., Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Preston, A. I., Cusumano, D., & Algozzine, K. (2019). A Descriptive Study of School-Based Problem-Solving. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617733717
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive analysis of solution implementation plans for 57 new problems discussed by the 38 teams. Table 2 reports chi-square tests: timeline χ2 = 8.634, p = .003; integrity-what χ2 = 12.965, p = .000; integrity-when χ2 = 4.095, p = .043; integrity-who χ2 = 7.529, p = .006; person χ2 = 0.459, p = .498 (no difference). No effect sizes printed.
"Although both trained and untrained teams identified a person responsible for solution implementation plans, trained teams identified a timeline and discussed implementation integrity (i.e., what, when, and who) more than untrained teams (see Table 2)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- TIPS-trained school teams define problems with greater precision (who, what, where, when, why) than untrained teams — related
- Trained teams specify intended goal changes and timelines far more often than untrained teams (95.8% and 96.8% vs 4.2% and 3.2%) — related
- Trained teams use more reward elements and fewer system-change elements, and fewer solution steps overall, than untrained teams — related
- After TIPS professional development, teams were more likely to define problems with precision, set implementation goals, and document implementation integrity and summative evaluation decisions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.