Claims

The TPSR leadership program significantly improved leadership behavior scores (initiation of structure and consideration) on the LBDQ compared with the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 After controlling for pretest scores, the experimental group's corrected posttest LBDQ scores were significantly higher than the control group's, with a high effect size (η² = .294). → Filiz 2019

Evidence

Filiz 2019

Filiz, B. (2019). Using personal and social responsibility model for gaining leadership behavior in students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.157

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

ANCOVA on LBDQ posttest scores in the same 55-student semi-experimental study; the article reports "the effect size is in the high level ( η2= .294)". Descriptive means showed increases in both initiation of structure and consideration in the experimental group and decreases in the control group.

"there was a statistically significant difference between corrected posttest point averages [ F (1,52)= 21.606, p=.00, p<.05]. According to the results of the Bonferroni test, there was a significant difference between the posttest mean score of the experimental group (X=4.144) and the control group ( X=3.849) in favor of the experimental group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.