Reviewed peer-tutoring simulation studies mostly reached only Kirkpatrick Level 2, with no assessment of behavior change or clinical-practice results¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The highest Kirkpatrick level achieved among the reviewed studies was Level 2, reported in nine out of ten studies assessing knowledge, skills, and attitudes; one study reached only Level 1, evaluating participant reaction exclusively. → Bertiola-Flores Claudio 2026
Evidence¶
Bertiola-Flores Claudio 2026¶
Bertiola-Flores Claudio, Infante-Villagrán Valeria Aylin, Palma-Vidal Natalia, Ferrada-Peña Claudio, Mazzo Alessandra, Díaz-Guio Diego Andrés. (2026). Peer tutoring in clinical simulation for health sciences education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09582-0
q2 · i? · review · r2
Review analysis of intervention outcomes by Kirkpatrick level across the included studies, finding no study reached Levels 3 or 4. The quote states "nine out of ten studies" reached Level 2 in the review's own words.
"the highest level achieved among the reviewed studies was Level 2, reported in nine out of ten studies, which assessed knowledge, skills, and attitudes [31–40]. The remaining study reached only Level 1"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Across Kirkpatrick Levels 1 and 2, most studies found no statistically significant differences between observer and active participant roles in simulation-based education — related
- Peer tutoring in clinical simulation is associated with gains in non-technical skills including self-efficacy, self-confidence, self-perception of learning, and reflective abilities — related
- Peer tutoring in clinical simulation is associated with improved technical skills such as laparoscopic tasks, lumbar puncture, and cardiovascular examination — related
- No included comparative study assessed patient-based clinical outcomes, patient acceptability of care, or staff resource time — related
- Limited evidence suggests PBL participants implement practice changes, but behavior-change data are sparse and mostly non-significant — related
- Evidence on transfer to clinical behavior and patient outcomes is scarce: only 2 studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3 and 1 reached level 4 — related
- Most direct ophthalmoscopy simulation studies achieve only Kirkpatrick Level 1 or 2 outcomes — related
- No included SDL studies measured Kirkpatrick Level 4 (patient/system) outcomes — related
- Self-assessed abilities are uncorrelated with actual performance measures, and Kirkpatrick level 1 is generally not recommended — related
- Included wound care educational interventions showed positive effects on students' wound care knowledge and clinical skills, mainly via self-assessment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.