Claims

Teachers rated the instructors' field-related and pedagogical qualifications very positively (M = 5.72 and M = 5.82)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants evaluated instructor qualifications related to the field and pedagogical qualifications positively. → Sayı 2018

Evidence

Sayı 2018

Sayı, A. K. (2018). Teachers’ Views about the Teacher Training Program for Gifted Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n4p262

q2 · i? · design · r2

Likert items on instructor qualifications from 71 teachers. Pedagogical qualifications scored “M: 5.82, SD: 0.53”, including positive attitude and behavior “M: 5.91, SD: 0.28”.

"Participants reported in the survey results that the instructors taught the course clearly (M: 5.84, SD: 0.40), were able to use necessary tools and equipment effectively when teaching (M: 5.61, SD: 0.59) and could utilize necessary methods and techniques in a way that enables effective participation (M: 5.72, SD: 0.50)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.