Claims

In a randomized trial of robotic mitral annuloplasty training, wet-laboratory, dry-laboratory and control groups improved on time-based scores while the virtual reality group did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants in the wet laboratory, dry laboratory and control groups showed significant improvements in time-based scores, whereas participants in the virtual reality group did not. → EL-Andari R 2023

Evidence

EL-Andari R 2023

EL-Andari R, Bozso SJ, Kang JJH, Fialka NM, Adams C, Nagendran J. (2023). Teaching heart valve surgery techniques using simulators: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017921

q2 · i? · review · r2

Randomized controlled trial reported in the review: 40 surgical trainees with fewer than 10 hours of da Vinci experience were randomized to wet laboratory, dry laboratory, virtual reality simulation or control after an instructional video; skills were evaluated with the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills using time-based scores (time subtracted from 720).

"Participants in the wet laboratory, dry laboratory and control groups showed significant improvements in their scores, whereas participants in the virtual reality group did not."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.