Claims

VBC outperforms controls whether delivered in single or multiple sessions and in simulated or live surgery

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Subgroup analyses found no significant differences in final or change scores between single and multiple VBC sessions, or between simulated and live surgical tasks, with VBC significantly better than controls in all these scenarios. → Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Evidence

Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Anderson Steven Mark, Gillanders Sarahlouise, Hickey Anne, Offiah Gozie, Davis Niall. (2025). Video Killed the Radio Star—A Meta‐Analysis on Video‐Based Coaching to Improve Surgical Skill. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12494

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analyses reported in the Results section assessed number of sessions and simulated versus live surgery as potential confounders of the summary effect; VBC remained significantly better than controls in all scenarios, with no subgroup effect sizes printed.

"No significant differences in final performance scores or change scores were seen whether trainees received single or multiple VBC sessions, or whether the surgical task was performed in a simulated setting or during live surgery, with significantly better scores observed in the VBC groups compared to the controls in all these scenarios"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.