Claims

Video-based coaching produces significantly higher final surgical technical performance scores than control feedback methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 In a meta-analysis of nine RCTs, average final performance scores were significantly higher for VBC participants than controls (SMD 0.71, 95% CI 0.37–1.04, p < 0.0001). → Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Evidence

Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Anderson Steven Mark, Gillanders Sarahlouise, Hickey Anne, Offiah Gozie, Davis Niall. (2025). Video Killed the Radio Star—A Meta‐Analysis on Video‐Based Coaching to Improve Surgical Skill. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12494

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of nine RCTs reporting final performance scores, with 94 VBC and 89 control participants; only final OSATS scores were used where multiple assessments existed. The pooled effect size was SMD 0.71 (95% CI 0.37, 1.04), showing scores "significantly higher than the controls".

"Overall, the average performance scores for VBC were significantly higher than the controls, with a SMD of 0.71 (95% CI 0.37, 1.04, Z = 4.15, p < 0.0001, and Figure 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.