Claims

The overwhelming majority of VBC participants across the studies found VBC a useful training tool

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Perceived usefulness of VBC, a secondary endpoint, was overwhelmingly positive among VBC participants across the included studies. → Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Evidence

Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Anderson Steven Mark, Gillanders Sarahlouise, Hickey Anne, Offiah Gozie, Davis Niall. (2025). Video Killed the Radio Star—A Meta‐Analysis on Video‐Based Coaching to Improve Surgical Skill. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12494

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Secondary endpoint analysis of participants' perceived usefulness of VBC across the 15 included RCTs; the abstract reports the finding qualitatively with no effect size or percentage printed.

"Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of VBC participants across the studies found VBC to a be useful training tool."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.