The vast majority of nursing students report positive emotional experiences in virtual simulation teaching, including excitement, reduced psychological burden, and boosted confidence¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most nursing students felt excitement, enjoyment, reduced fear and psychological burden, and increased confidence during VS teaching because safe virtual settings allow error-free rehearsal and private repetition. → Zhang Guoyong 2026
Evidence¶
Zhang Guoyong 2026¶
Zhang Guoyong, Sun Xianghong, Yang Dan, Shao Qinwen. (2026). Nursing students’ experiences in virtual simulation teaching: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1863553
q2 · i? · review · r3
Synthesized finding from the meta-synthesis of 17 qualitative studies, drawing on student interview accounts such as feeling relieved to experience interventions in advance through vSim. The review reports positive experiences including reduced psychological burden, privacy protection, and confidence gains.
"The vast majority of nursing students felt excitement after engaging in VS teaching. The highly immersive experimental scenarios provided a novel experience, which they found intriguing and enjoyable"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Safety — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- A minority of nursing students report negative emotional responses to virtual simulation teaching, including fear, anxiety, and burnout — reports the opposite
- Learners valued safe, repeatable, nonjudgmental AI practice environments that reduced anxiety and bridged the theory-practice gap — related
- Immersive VR simulation increased self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation more than a conventional safety manual in laboratory safety training — related
- In a piloted virtual reality WIL, most students reported improved crisis-problem-solving understanding and high enjoyment — related
- The most frequently reported challenge of virtual simulation teaching is its lack of realism, alongside operational complexity, English-language demands, cultural mismatch, and adverse physical reactions — reports the opposite
- A JBI meta-synthesis of 17 qualitative studies integrates nursing students' virtual simulation experiences into nine categories and four synthesized findings — a broader claim this one bears on
- Educators reported challenges including lacking confidence, feeling nervous, and requiring significant training and expertise when using online simulation approaches — related
- Extended immersive ward-based simulation may improve preparedness and self-confidence of nursing students — related
- Immersive VR tracheostomy training reduced anxiety more than regular training at follow-up — related
- XR gesture-simulation interventions reduce anxiety in most included midwifery and nursing education studies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.