Academics hold both positive and negative views of Web 2.0 tools for self-actualisation, with creativity skills the most frequent positive and time loss the most frequent negative¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Academics' opinions on Web 2.0 tools for self-actualisation were mixed: 'creativity skills' was the most repeated positive expression and 'spending too much time, business disruption' the most repeated negative expression. → YILDIZ 2021

Evidence¶

YILDIZ 2021¶

YILDIZ, Ezgi Pelin. (2021). Academist Perceptions on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools Through Maslow's Needs Hierarchy: A Case Study. Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol.4, No.1, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.185

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of Table 3 opinion categories (80 coded expressions) from the same 20-academician case study; positive opinions included creativity skills (13.6%) and negative opinions included spending too much time (14.8%).

"Most repeated expressive is 'creativity skills' in the context of positive opinions; most repeated ex pressive in the context of negative opinion is 'spending too much time, business disruption at this point'."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Academics most often name Facebook as the Web 2.0 tool they use to realise belonging and love needs — related
• Academics most often name Instagram and LinkedIn as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise esteem needs — related
• Academics most often name YouTube and Instagram as the Web 2.0 tools they use to realise self-actualisation needs — related
• Academics most often name smartphones and personal computers as the tools they use to realise physiological needs — related