Claims

Students identified undetailed interpretation and ineffective feedback as the main disadvantages of the WeChat mobile learning mode

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 69.39% of students cited undetailed interpretation and 59.18% cited an ineffective feedback channel as disadvantages. → Dai et al. 2018

Evidence

Dai et al. 2018

Guiyu Dai, Yang Liu & Shanmeng Cui. (2018). A Study on the Mobile Learning of English and American Literature Based on Wechat Public Account. English Language Teaching, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n6p47

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Question 16 (multiple choice) asked about disadvantages compared with traditional classroom teaching. Undetailed interpretation (69.39%) and ineffective feedback channel (59.18%) were the top responses, followed by wide range of content (28.57%) and repetition with classroom teaching (20.41%).

"The date in Table 20 shows that 69.39% of the students believe articles in Wechat platform are not explained in detail. Other drawback of this mode is its inconvenient feedback channel so that 59.18% of the students choose the option of ineffective feedback channel."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.