Students viewed WeChat mobile learning as a supplement to, not a substitute for, traditional classroom teaching¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 63.27% agreed the WeChat mode is not as important as classroom teaching (mean 3.71), and 59.18% strongly disagreed that it can substitute classroom teaching (mean 1.63). → Dai et al. 2018
Evidence¶
Dai et al. 2018¶
Guiyu Dai, Yang Liu & Shanmeng Cui. (2018). A Study on the Mobile Learning of English and American Literature Based on Wechat Public Account. English Language Teaching, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n6p47
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Questionnaire Part 4 compared the WeChat mode with classroom teaching. Q17 (not as important as classroom teaching) mean 3.71; Q18 (can substitute classroom teaching) drew 59.18% strong disagreement and 22.45% disagreement.
"The mean of question 18 (1.63) states a negative position in answering this question, which means that most of the students do not think Wechat public account based mobile learning mode can substitute classroom teaching."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students using WeChat public account based mobile learning achieved significantly higher final test scores than control group students — related
- Most students held a positive impression of and adapted well to the WeChat public account based mobile learning mode — related
- The WeChat mobile learning mode helped students learn literature in interest stimulation, ability improvement, and content learning — related
- Students identified undetailed interpretation and ineffective feedback as the main disadvantages of the WeChat mobile learning mode — related
- Students using WeChat public account based mobile learning achieved significantly higher mid-term literature test scores than control group students — related
- Students' agreement on the disadvantages of mobile learning was weaker and more uncertain, with 45.3% positive, 25.3% negative and 21.3% neutral — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.