Included wound care educational interventions showed positive effects on students' wound care knowledge and clinical skills, mainly via self-assessment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most reviewed interventions improved participants' wound care knowledge and skills, but data were mainly self-assessments and collected directly after the intervention. → Reiter Manuel 2025
Evidence¶
Reiter Manuel 2025¶
Reiter Manuel, Busch Dorothee, Erfurt‐Berge Cornelia. (2025). Educational Interventions for Medical Students in Chronic Wound Care—A Scoping Review. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70760
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's descriptive synthesis of the nine included quasi-experimental and mixed-methods studies: most showed improved knowledge and skills, but "data were mainly collected by self‐assessments" and validated scores were used in only one study.
"Most studies showed improved skills and increased knowledge of participants after attending interventions. However, data were mainly collected by self‐assessments. Validated scores were only used in one of the nine studies"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Only nine studies of educational interventions for chronic wound care targeting medical students were identified in a scoping review of six databases — related
- No study compared the effectiveness of different wound care educational approaches or against traditional lectures — related
- Online and interprofessional wound care courses increased students' subjective knowledge and were well accepted — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Reviewed peer-tutoring simulation studies mostly reached only Kirkpatrick Level 2, with no assessment of behavior change or clinical-practice results — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.