Design peer assessment to encourage specific problem-identifying feedback, suggestions, and affective support rather than grades alone¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 4 claims (3 for, 1 against) · 1 study (1 associational),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article's implications for teachers designing peer assessment: ask students "to be specific in their feedback, particularly with regard to the problems in assessees' work, and to provide suggestions"; scaffold assessment processes, especially for weak students; encourage exchanging affective comments giving socio-emotional support; and have students explain why they assigned particular grades rather than simply assigning grades.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Modeling or training should be provided prior to or during the task because peer assessment is not easy
Constraints¶
- Effects on assessees are complex; weak students may need specific instructions on feedback types and encouragement to implement received feedback
Target Learners¶
- high school students conducting project-based learning
Target Learning Goals¶
- improved project performance through formative peer assessment
Claims¶
- Cognitive feedback benefits assessors rather than assessees, and weak students do not benefit from receiving more feedback [-W]
- Giving feedback that identifies problems in peers' work is a significant predictor of assessors' own project performance [+W]
- Giving suggestions to peers is a significant predictor of assessors' own project performance [+W]
- Receiving positive affective feedback from peers is a significant predictor of assessees' project performance [+W]
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
- iLAP (Interactive Learning and Assessment Platform): the Hong Kong platform on which the peer assessment was run
Key Sources¶
- Jingyan Lu, Nancy Law. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science 40:257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
peer-assessment-design-strategy-lu-law |
title |
Design peer assessment to encourage specific problem-identifying feedback, suggestions, and affective support rather than grades alone |
description |
The article's implications for teachers designing peer assessment: ask students "to be specific in their feedback, particularly with regard to the problems in assessees' work, and to provide suggestions"; scaffold ass... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jingyan-lu-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.