Claims

Activity-based teaching produced significantly higher post-test achievement than traditional lecture instruction in a higher-secondary education course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental group students achieved significantly higher post-test MCQ scores (mean 15.6) than control group students (mean 10.7) after five chapters taught through hands-on activities. → Anwar 2019

Evidence

Anwar 2019

Anwar, F. (2019). The effect of activity-based teaching techniques on student motivation and academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 154-170. https://journals.iobmresearch.com/index.php/JEED

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest control group experiment; 30 students randomly assigned (15 per group) with the same teacher teaching both groups. Independent samples t-test gave t = 4.65, df = 28, sig .000, described as "a significant difference between mean education achievement scores".

"Independent samples t-test as seen in Table 1, revealed that there was a significant difference between mean education achievement scores of experimental and female control group students. The mean value indicated that participants from experimental group showed more achievement in post-test 15.6 while control group students scored 10.7."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.