Claims

Experimental group significantly outperformed control group on post-test vocabulary learning strategies questionnaire total score

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the total vocabulary learning strategies questionnaire post-test (η² = 0.154). → Ismaiel 2017

Evidence

Ismaiel 2017

Ismaiel, N. M., & Al Asmari, A. A. (2017). The Effectiveness of a programme-based Vocabulary Learning Strategies for Developing English Vocabulary for EFL Female Students at Taif University. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.113

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

T-test on post-test VLS questionnaire total scores for 123 female EFL students showed the experimental group (M=220.836) significantly outperformed the control group (M=201.838), with η²=0.154.

"significant differences between the control group (M=201.838, SD= 22.437) and the experimental group (M=220.836, SD= 22.105) t ( 121 ) = 4.700, p = 0.001, η2= 0.154. on the vocabulary questionnaire strategies and its factors, for the experimental group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.