Claims

CGRP silencing reduces freezing at high footshock intensities where control mice show significant increases in freezing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? At 0.4 and 0.5 mA, control mice showed significant increases in freezing while TetTox mice maintained significantly lower freezing levels. → Hanny Hayeon Lee 2026 q3 i? Retention test 3 freezing percentage showed a significant CGRP manipulation × Footshock Intensity interaction. → Hanny Hayeon Lee 2026 (2)

Evidence

Hanny Hayeon Lee 2026

Hanny Hayeon Lee, Eul Han & Yong Sang Jo. (2026). CGRP inhibition in the PBN shifts defensive strategy from freezing to active avoidance in a platform-based active avoidance paradigm. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00453-3

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Freezing analysis in the CGRP-silencing experiment (TetTox vs eYFP controls, n = 7 per intensity cohort) during retention tests: at 0.4 and 0.5 mA "the TetTox mice maintained significantly lower freezing levels" than controls.

"However, at 0.4 and 0.5 mA, the control group exhibited significant increases in freezing, while the TetTox mice maintained significantly lower freezing levels (Fig. 4h)."

Hanny Hayeon Lee 2026 (2)

Hanny Hayeon Lee, Eul Han & Yong Sang Jo. (2026). CGRP inhibition in the PBN shifts defensive strategy from freezing to active avoidance in a platform-based active avoidance paradigm. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00453-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Omnibus two-way ANOVA on retention test 3 freezing percentage (Fig. 4h) reported a significant CGRP manipulation × Footshock Intensity interaction, F(4,48) = 11,75, ***p < 0.001, with Bonferroni post-hoc group differences at 0.4 and 0.5 mA.

"Two-way ANOVA: signi ficant main effects of CGRP manipulation [ F(1,12) = 21.77, ***p < 0.001], Footshock Intensity [F(4,48) = 37.50, ***p < 0.001], and their interaction [ F(4,48) = 11,75, ***p < 0.001]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cgrp-silencing-reduces-freezing-high-intensity
title CGRP silencing reduces freezing at high footshock intensities where control mice show significant increases in freezing
description CGRP silencing reduces freezing at high footshock intensities where control mice show significant increases in freezing
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hanny-hayeon-lee-2026, hanny-hayeon-lee-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.