Claims

Male and female students taught Igbo language reading comprehension with the cloze approach do not differ significantly in achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among students taught with the cloze approach, the difference between male and female mean Igbo reading comprehension scores is not statistically significant. → Nneka Justina Eze 2015

Evidence

Nneka Justina Eze 2015

Nneka Justina Eze. (2015). Effects of Cloze Instructional Approach on Senior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Igbo Language Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079076

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on treatment-group-only data (21 males, 26 females) by gender. Adjusted means were 57.90 for males and 54.38 for females; the article reports no significant difference, and equivalence was not tested. No effect size is printed.

"Summary of result in Table 5 indicates that the F.c alculated value is 1.238 while the F.critical value at 95% confidence level is 4.08. Since the calculated valu e is less than the critical value the researcher up holds the null hypothesis and concludes that there is no significant difference in the mean Igbo Language reading comprehension scores of male and female students taught using the cloze approach."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.