Claims

No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught Technical Drawing with PowerPoint presentation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There was no statistically significant difference in posttest achievement between male and female students in the PPT group; equivalence was not tested. → Amosa Isiaka Gambari 2014

Evidence

Amosa Isiaka Gambari 2014

Amosa Isiaka Gambari, Hamdalat Taiwo Yusuf, Sherifat Adepeju Balogun. (2014). Effectiveness of Powerpoint Presentation On Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 3, Issue 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085923

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on the 45-student PPT group with pretest as covariate compared male and female posttest scores. The article reports "F (1, 42) = 1.697, p > .05", so hypothesis two was not rejected; no effect size is printed.

"The F value of 1.697 was not significant at the .05 alp ha level [ F (1, 42) = 1.697, p > .05)]. The result shows that there was no significant difference in the performance of male and female students taught using PPT."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.