Claims

Content ranked first among CSFs by mean response, followed by technical competence, user friendly design, learner community development, and ownership.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Content had the highest ranked mean (3.958), followed by technical competence (3.848), user friendly design (3.646), learner community development (3.564), and ownership (3.499). → Muasaad Alrasheedi and Luiz Fernando Capretz 2015

Evidence

Muasaad Alrasheedi and Luiz Fernando Capretz 2015

Muasaad Alrasheedi and Luiz Fernando Capretz. (2015). Determination of critical success factors affecting mobile learning: a meta-analysis approach. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp. 41-51. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095705

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Ranking derived from aggregated means in Table 5 of the meta-analysis of nine studies. The article states "content is considered to have the most influence, followed by technical competence of learners, user friendly design, learner community development, and ownership"; net means were 3.958, 3.848, 3.646, 3.564, and 3.499 respectively.

"It is seen that content is considered to have the most influence, followed by technical competence of learners, user friendly design, learner community development, and ownership."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.