Claims

Across 19 quantitative m-Learning studies in higher education, 21 critical success factors were identified, with learner perceptions appearing in the most studies (15) and ownership in 14.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A meta-analysis of 19 studies detected 21 CSFs, with learner perceptions cited in 15 studies and ownership in 14. → Muasaad Alrasheedi and Luiz Fernando Capretz 2015

Evidence

Muasaad Alrasheedi and Luiz Fernando Capretz 2015

Muasaad Alrasheedi and Luiz Fernando Capretz. (2015). Determination of critical success factors affecting mobile learning: a meta-analysis approach. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp. 41-51. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095705

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Systematic literature review using meta-analysis technique of 19 quantitative m-Learning studies in higher education published since 2007. The review states "A total of 21 factors were discovered in the studies" considered important for m-Learning success; Table 2 shows learner perceptions in 15 studies and ownership in 14.

"A total of 21 factors were discovered in the studies that researchers considered to be important for the success of m-Learning in higher educational institutions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.