Claims

Cooperative learning raised expectancy-component motivation (control of learning beliefs, self-efficacy for learning and performance) more than lecture-based teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on control of learning beliefs and self-confidence and belief for learning and performance at post-test. → Tran 2019

Evidence

Tran 2019

Van Dat Tran. (2019). Does Cooperative Learning Increase Students' Motivation in Learning? International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 12. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p12

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-test independent t-tests (n = 36 per group) on expectancy components: control of learning beliefs t = 3.34, p = .046; self-confidence and belief for learning and performance t = 4.01, p = .021, both favouring the cooperative learning group. No effect sizes are printed.

"Control of learning beliefs 4.47 .51 4.03 .52 3.34 .046* Self-confidence and belief for learning and performance 4.51 .58 4.07 .56 4.01 .021*"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.