Claims

Cooperative learning's top rank in the broad network rests entirely on a single visual-motor integration study and disappears when that study is removed

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 In the 19-study broad network, Cooperative produced the largest estimated effect and highest P-score (0.994; SMD 3.855, 95% CI 2.141 to 5.568), but the node was defined solely by the Akil visual-motor integration study and did not constitute replicated evidence. → Tian Qi 2026

Evidence

Tian Qi 2026

Tian Qi, Liu Yaowen, Wang Ziyu, Qin Gang. (2026). Comparative effects of physical education teaching models on motor skill development in school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1905122

q2 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Broad sensitivity network meta-analysis. Because Akil (39) was Cooperative's only contributing study, "its exclusion removed the Cooperative node rather than changing estimates among the remaining connected treatments." The extreme rank is a single-study artifact.

"In the 19-study broad network, Cooperative produced the largest estimated effect and the highest P-score (P-score = 0.994; SMD = 3.855, 95% CI 2.141 to 5.568), but this node was defined solely by Akil (39) and therefore did not constitute replicated evidence."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.