Claims

Corpus-based DDL activities outperformed traditional activities for learning verb-adverb collocations in a Macedonian university study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? First-year students using an online concordancer learned more collocations and scored better on a verb-adverb collocation test than students in traditional activities. → Rasikawati 2019

Evidence

Rasikawati 2019

Ira Rasikawati (2019). Corpus-Based Data-Driven Learning to Augment L2 Students’ Vocabulary Repertoire. International Dialogues on Education, 6(2), 83-98. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1245249

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports this single comparison study of 46 first-year students in Macedonia, in which the experimental group used an online concordancer. The review attributes the finding that these students "learned more collocations" and scored better on the verb-adverb collocation test; no effect size is printed.

"Daskalovska (2015) compared the effectiveness of corpus -based activities and traditional activities for learning collocations among 46 first -year students in a university in the Republic of Macedonia. The study found that students in the experimental group, who used the online concordancer learned more collocations and showed better results on the test that measured their knowledge of verb-adverb collocations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.