Claims

Demographic and socioeconomic variables did not significantly predict parental resistance to educational smartphone use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? None of the demographic and socioeconomic variables (gender, child smartphone ownership, education stage and level, income) significantly predicted resistance level. → Hadad 2020

Evidence

Hadad 2020

Hadad, S., Meishar-Tal, H., & Blau, I. (2020). The parents' tale: Why parents resist the educational use of smartphones at schools?. Computers & Education, 157, 103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103984

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Regression step 1 (Table 7) entered the five demographic/socioeconomic variables and "explained 3.5% of the variance" in resistance level; no effect sizes printed, only a null result. Equivalence was not tested.

"In addition, the study examined a variety o f demographic and socioeconomic variables related to the child and to the parent. Surprisingly, none of these variables significantly predicted actual parental resistance level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.