ACE-outcome associations did not differ between girls and boys¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? None of the gender-by-ACE interactions were significant for any outcome, suggesting associations were similar for girls and boys in this sample. → Leonardo Bevilacqua 2021
Evidence¶
Leonardo Bevilacqua 2021¶
Leonardo Bevilacqua, Yvonne Kelly, Anja Heilmann, Naomi Priest, Rebecca E. Lacey. (2021). Adverse childhood experiences and trajectories of internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors from childhood to adolescence. Child Abuse & Neglect 112 (2021) 104890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104890
q3 · i? · associational · r3
Interactions between gender and each ACE operationalisation were tested in the mixed effects models of the MCS cohort. The article states "We did not find any gender differences in associations between any of our ACE operationalisations and outcomes" and presents combined results. No effect sizes were printed for the interaction tests.
"none of the gender*ACE interactions were significant suggesting that in this sample the associations were similar for girls and boys"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- ACE scores show a graded positive association with externalizing behavior trajectories, the strongest of the three outcomes
- ACE scores show a graded negative association with prosocial behavior trajectories from age 3 to 14
- Latent class analysis failed to discriminate ACE clusters in the Millennium Cohort Study data
- ACE scores show a graded positive association with internalizing behavior trajectories from age 3 to 14
- Harsh parenting and physical punishment show the strongest individual-ACE associations with externalizing behavior
- Parental discord and parental depression show the strongest individual-ACE associations with internalizing behavior
- Prosocial behavior, aggression, and peer relationships are stratified along gender, ethnoracial, and socioeconomic lines — related
- Total anxiety predicts later fluency for girls only, via a significant gender-by-anxiety interaction — reports the opposite
- Gender did not significantly moderate relationships between social functioning and academic development in preschoolers — related
- Gender moderates the link between educational processes and children's social–emotional competence, with stronger associations for girls than boys — reports the opposite
- Growth mindset interacts with gender for health major choice — men's chances decline 3.9 percentage points per unit increase — but no gender difference appears in how ability beliefs influence PEMC major choice — reports the opposite
- Sex-specific subgroup models show the same functional forms for boys and girls, though cubic coefficients for boys were not significant after correction — related
- Studies of preservice teachers found no statistically significant associations between gender or other sociodemographic variables and AHS — related
- Girls scored significantly higher than boys on writing quality, handwriting fluency, and attitude toward writing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-gender-differences-ace-associations |
title |
ACE-outcome associations did not differ between girls and boys |
description |
ACE-outcome associations did not differ between girls and boys |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — leonardo-bevilacqua-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.