The evidence base on dialogic leadership is entirely qualitative, with the majority (n = 17, 63%) of studies being case studies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All research discussing dialogic leadership's impacts and approach included in the review is qualitative, and the authors call for broader-scale empirical studies. → Shiza Khaqan 2024
Evidence¶
Shiza Khaqan 2024¶
Shiza Khaqan, Gisela Redondo-Sama. (2024). A systematic review of the role of dialogic leadership: Characterization and impacts. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100618
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review's discussion of its own corpus of 27 peer-reviewed articles states the research is "all qualitative in nature with the majority (n = 17, 63%) being case studies". The authors state this reflects the need for studies measuring impact across larger samples. No effect size is printed.
"The results from the current review reveal that the research that discusses the impacts of dialogic leadership and dialogic leadership as an approach are all qualitative in nature with the majority (n = 17, 63%) being case studies."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Dialogic leadership is associated with increased social cohesion, including social unity, lasting friendships and greater community involvement — related
- Dialogic leadership values diversity as an asset and fosters inclusion of marginalized groups — related
- Implementing dialogic leadership is associated with improved academic outcomes, reduced absenteeism and increased learning progress — related
- Dialogic leadership is characterized by egalitarianism, signifying the absence of hierarchical levels of leaders and followers — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dialogic-leadership-evidence-all-qualitative |
title |
The evidence base on dialogic leadership is entirely qualitative, with the majority (n = 17, 63%) of studies being case studies |
description |
The evidence base on dialogic leadership is entirely qualitative, with the majority (n = 17, 63%) of studies being case studies |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shiza-khaqan-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.