Claims

Students with disabilities are suspended at more than twice the rate of students without disabilities, and Black students with disabilities face the highest risk at 19%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In 2017–18, 9% of students with disabilities were suspended compared to 4% of students without disabilities; 19% of Black students with disabilities were suspended. → Leung-Gagné 2022

Evidence

Leung-Gagné 2022

Leung-Gagné, M., McCombs, J., Scott, C., & Losen, D. J. (2022). Pushed out: Trends and disparities in out-of-school suspension. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/235.277

q2 · i? · associational · r2

CRDC analysis disaggregating suspension rates by disability status and race (Figure 3). The report states "almost 1 out of 11 students with disabilities (9%) were suspended" and that Black students with disabilities consistently have the highest risk, at nearly 1 in 5 (19%).

"In 2017–18, almost 1 out of 11 students with disabilities (9%) were suspended, compared to 4% for students without disabilities."

Studies bearing on this claim

Are learners with disabilities excluded from school by discipline more often than their peers? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 5 narrower claims that bear on it: 6 distinct studies (3 associational, 2 review, 1 qualitative), q2, 0 of 6 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Leung-Gagné 2022 q2 · associational · r2 i? this claim
Arnold 2025 q2 · qualitative · r2 i? Students with disabilities are overrepresented in school discipline: 16 percent of enrollm (supports)
Cardichon 2019 q2 · review · r1 i? Students of color and students with disabilities are disproportionately suspended and refe (supports)
DePaoli 2025 q2 · review · r2 i? Black students and students with disabilities are disproportionately referred for behavior (supports)
Stephen Lipscomb 2017 q2 · associational · r? i? Youth with an IEP experience bullying and suspension at higher rates and are less engaged (supports)
Albert Y. Liu 2018 q2 · associational · r? i? Grade retention, suspensions, and expulsions among youth with an IEP showed little change (qualifies)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id disability-suspension-disparity
title Students with disabilities are suspended at more than twice the rate of students without disabilities, and Black students with disabilities face the highest risk at 19%
description Students with disabilities are suspended at more than twice the rate of students without disabilities, and Black students with disabilities face the highest risk at 19%
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
recheck_by 2027
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — leung-gagné-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.