Disguised attitude measures can detect propaganda effects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1953 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 1956: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The study used disguised attitude measures to study propaganda effectiveness. → Jarrett 1953
Evidence¶
Jarrett 1953¶
Jarrett, R. F., & Sherriffs, A. C. (1953). Propaganda, Debate, and Impartial Presentation as Determiners of Attitude Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 33–41. doi:10.1037/h0062882 (read through Allen's 1953 research abstract, doi:10.1007/bf02713265)
q2 · i? · causal · r1
The article states a purpose was "To study propaganda effectiveness thru the use of disguised attitude measures." The supplied text is truncated before results are reported.
"To study propaganda effectiveness thru the use of disguised attitude measures."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Interview-type radio presentation compared with monologue for attitude change — related
- Male and female subjects responded differently, confounding interpretation — related
- Impartial presentation of both sides moderates attitudinal position — related
- An experiment compared one-sided and two-sided propaganda presentations for preparing high school students to resist subsequent counter-propaganda — related
- In debate situations subjects move toward their pre-existing bias — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.