Male and female subjects responded differently, confounding interpretation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1953 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Men and women varied in their responses to the presentation conditions, confounding interpretation of the findings. → Jarrett 1953
Evidence¶
Jarrett 1953¶
Jarrett, R. F., & Sherriffs, A. C. (1953). Propaganda, Debate, and Impartial Presentation as Determiners of Attitude Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 33–41. doi:10.1037/h0062882 (read through Allen's 1953 research abstract, doi:10.1007/bf02713265)
q2 · i? · causal · r1
The authors report that "Men and women Ss varied in their responses to these conditions, thus confounding the interpretation of the findings" and that results were not in each case statistically significant.
"Men and women Ss varied in their responses to these conditions, thus confounding the interpretation of the findings, but the results, though not in each case statistically significant, are not inconsistent with our hypotheses concerning the nature of attitude change."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- In debate situations subjects move toward their pre-existing bias — related
- Disguised attitude measures can detect propaganda effects — related
- Impartial presentation of both sides moderates attitudinal position — related
- Female STEM majors report significantly lower sense of belonging than male majors — related
- In an appetitive PIT transfer phase, both males and females show a direction bias, choosing cue-congruent responses more than incongruent ones, with no sex difference — related
- In an aversive PIT paradigm, the intensity bias (stronger grip force) is again present in males but not females, showing the sex difference is valence-independent — related
- Men reported higher monitoring judgments on health math problems than women, even accounting for performance accuracy — related
- An introduction arousing suspicion of the communicator's motives leads the identical communication to be judged more one-sided — related
- Within the experimental group, female participants responded better to humour-based teaching than male participants — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.