Claims

Medical students prioritize medical competence over teaching competence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In only one of the four included studies targeting students' opinions was competence in teaching rated among the top 5 attributes of a good doctor; students' focus was on medical competence and general interpersonal qualities. → Steiner-Hofbauer Verena 2017

Evidence

Steiner-Hofbauer Verena 2017

Steiner-Hofbauer Verena, Schrank Beate, Holzinger Anita. (2017). What is a good doctor? Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Synthesis of the four included student-targeted studies (e.g. Maudsley et al. 2007, Gillies et al. 2009, Pfeiffer et al. 2011, Cuesta-Briand et al. 2014). The review reports that even for students, who are directly affected by teaching skills, "medical competence" is rated higher than teaching competence.

"Studies which targeted students’ opinions showed that in only one of the included 4 studies “competence in teaching” (being a good teacher) was rated under the top 5 attributes of a good doctor."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.