The two groups did not differ significantly on the pretest before instruction¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pretest scores were not statistically significant between groups (11.37±1.42 vs. 11.73±0.69, p = 0.212), indicating equivalent baseline knowledge. → Omrani 2012

Evidence¶

Omrani 2012¶

Omrani, S., Fardanesh, H., Hemmati, N., & Hemmati, N. (2012). Exploring an appropriate instructional design model for continuing medical education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ997826

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Baseline comparison on the 20-item multiple-choice pretest; Table 2 reports t = 1.267, p = 0.212, so the groups began with the same degree of knowledge before the programs.

"the average scores achieved in the pretest exam in two groups were not statistically significant (11.37±1.42 VS. 11.73±0.69, P>0.05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental and control groups were academically equivalent on the organic chemistry achievement test before the treatment — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on the pre test — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
• Before treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no significant difference in overall language proficiency — related
• The lecture and academic controversy groups showed no significant difference in TUCE pretest scores, indicating equivalent prior economic knowledge — related
• Chatbot and search engine classes showed no significant baseline differences in science learning ability and knowledge before the intervention — related
• The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
• High and low CT groups showed comparable prior coding knowledge before the AICA intervention — related
• The two groups did not differ significantly in writing quality before the treatment — related
• The two groups did not differ significantly in age or psychology pretest scores before the treatment — related
• The control and experimental groups did not differ significantly on the pre-test — related