Claims

Experimental group gained memorization skill over time while control group did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Wilcoxon tests showed the experimental group gained memorization skill from pre-test to post-test while the control group did not. → Yucetoker 2016

Evidence

Yucetoker 2016

Yucetoker, I. (2016). The visual memory-based memorization techniques in piano education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 65, 111-128. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.65.07

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon signed-rank tests: experimental group showed significant pre-post difference (z=2.251, p=.024); control group showed no significant difference (z=.962, p=.336).

"the experimental group students who studied the memorization techniques while working with inventions gained memorization skills at the end of the research"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.