Claims

The experimental group shows significant within-group gains from pre-test to post-test in speaking skill.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's speaking-skill scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-test. → Jose 2012

Evidence

Jose 2012

Jose, G. R., & Dharma Raja, B. W. (2012). Multimedia Modular Approach for Augmenting the Speaking Skill of the Student-Teachers. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070215

q2 · i? · causal · r2

A dependent t-test compared the experimental group's pre-test and post-test speaking-skill scores. The mean improved from 25.38 at pre-test to 67.13 at post-test, a statistically significant gain at the 1% level.

"In the Table 3, since p value is less than 0.01 in the scores of the speaking skill, the null hypothesis is not accepted at 1% level of significance. Hence, there is a significant difference between the pretest and the posttest scores of the experimental group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.