The Philipsen et al. framework findings can be applied to guide TPD for recovery and a resilient education system¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 theoretical r1–r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The international-perspective response by Portillo Berasaluce and Lopez de la Serna holds that the framework's findings can guide TPD for recovery and a resilient education system. → Gloria Natividad Beltrán del Río 2021

q1 i? The findings of the meta-aggregative TPD review can be applied to guide appropriate TPD for pandemic recovery and a resilient education system. → Portillo 2021

Evidence¶

Gloria Natividad Beltrán del Río 2021¶

Gloria Natividad Beltrán del Río. (2021). A useful framework for teacher professional development for online and blended learning to use as guidance in times of crisis. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09953-y

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

Editorial summary of the international response article to Philipsen et al.'s review by Javier Portillo Berasaluce and Arantzazu Lopez de la Serna; the applicability to recovery and resilience is the respondents' stated assessment, reported second-hand.

"The findings can be clearly applied to guide an appropriate TPD for the recovery as well as for a resilient education system"

Portillo 2021¶

Portillo, J., Lopez de la Serna, A. (2021). An international perspective for ‘Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review’. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09851-9

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Authors' interpretive commentary (type e) in a response paper asserting that the reviewed TPD findings "can be clearly applied to guide appropriated TPD for the recovery"; no evidence or argument is offered for this assertion.

"The findings can be clearly applied to guide appropriated TPD for the recovery as well as for a resilient education system."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Seven responses to Philipsen et al.'s study offer valuable ideas and guidelines for developing TPD for OBL in times of crisis — a broader claim this one bears on
• The Philipsen et al. framework functions as a model of inquiry for examining TPD for OBL strategies in crisis contexts — related
• The COVID-19 mandated shift to digital teaching created learning and performance contexts so different that the Philipsen et al. TPD-for-OBL framework's applicability may be limited — related
• The response discusses limitations of the Philipsen et al. (2019) review and suggestions for future research — related
• The response summarizes the key findings of the Philipsen et al. (2019) meta-aggregative review — related
• The Philipsen et al. framework of TPD components for online and blended learning is biased toward higher education settings — related
• The meta-aggregative review lacks an explicitly critical framework and under-addresses equity — related
• International organisations UNESCO and ILO identify teacher professional development for online and blended learning as a priority, per this response — related