Claims

Within the experimental group, social skill scores increased significantly from pretest to posttest and follow-up

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Social skill posttest mean scores of experimental-group students were significantly higher than pretest scores (t(10) = 4.65, η2 = 0.75), and follow-up scores were also significantly higher than pretest (t(10) = 4.24, η2 = 0.94). → Çelik 2016

Evidence

Çelik 2016

Çelik, S., Diken, İ. H., Çolak, A., Arıkan, A., Bozkurt, F., & Tomris, G. (2016). Effectiveness of the preschool version of the first step to success early intervention program for preventing antisocial behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 511-535. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0317

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-tests on the 11 experimental-group children's PKBS social skill scores; the article also reports the pretest-follow-up contrast as significant (t(10) = 4.24, p < .05, η2 = 0.94).

"Findings of the study revealed that social skill posttest mean scores of students from experimental group were significantly higher than those of pretest scores (t(10) = 4.65, p < .05, η2 = 0.75)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.