Claims

Teachers and parents reported positive social validity of FSS-PSV, with most happy with the program and willing to recommend it

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 10 of 11 parents (91%) stated the program met their needs at home and contributed positively to their children's peer relationships; the majority of teachers stated positive opinions and would recommend the program. → Çelik 2016

Evidence

Çelik 2016

Çelik, S., Diken, İ. H., Çolak, A., Arıkan, A., Bozkurt, F., & Tomris, G. (2016). Effectiveness of the preschool version of the first step to success early intervention program for preventing antisocial behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 511-535. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0317

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Social validity was measured with five-point Likert FSS-PSV Teacher and Parent Satisfaction Forms completed after implementation by 11 experimental-group teachers and 11 parents; responses were analyzed with frequencies and percentages.

"10 of 11 parents (91%) stated that the program met their needs at home and it made positive contributions to their children in terms of their relationships with their friends."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.