Claims

FSS-PSV implementation did not produce a group difference in social skills: both experimental and control groups increased significantly

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? There was no significant interaction between group and time factor for total social skill scores (F = 0.23, p = .23); both groups increased significantly from pretest to posttest and kept the gain at follow-up. → Çelik 2016

Evidence

Çelik 2016

Çelik, S., Diken, İ. H., Çolak, A., Arıkan, A., Bozkurt, F., & Tomris, G. (2016). Effectiveness of the preschool version of the first step to success early intervention program for preventing antisocial behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 511-535. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0317

q3 · i? · causal · r1

3×2 mixed ANOVA of PKBS social skill scores for 11 experimental and 11 control children; the article reports a significant pretest-to-posttest increase for both groups (p = .00) and no change from posttest to follow-up (p = 1.00).

"Examining the ANOVA summary table, it would be seen that there was not any significant interaction between experimental or control group and time factor (F = 0.23, p = .23)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.