Claims

Hope is the strongest positive predictor of eudaimonic and overall teacher wellbeing (ρ = .75 and .76)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Hope was the strongest positive predictor of eudaimonic (ρ = .75) and overall wellbeing (ρ = .76) among teachers. → Sijing Zhou 2024

Evidence

Sijing Zhou 2024

Sijing Zhou, Gavin R. Slemp & Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick. (2024). Factors Associated with Teacher Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of 173 studies (N = 89,876) following PRISMA, using Schmidt and Hunter psychometric correction for sampling and measurement error. The results section reports that "Hope was the strongest posi- tive predictors of eudaimonic (ρ = .75) and overall wellbeing (ρ = .76)."

"Hope was the strongest posi- tive predictors of eudaimonic (ρ = .75) and overall wellbeing (ρ = .76)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id hope-strongest-positive-predictor-teacher-wellbeing
title Hope is the strongest positive predictor of eudaimonic and overall teacher wellbeing (ρ = .75 and .76)
description Hope is the strongest positive predictor of eudaimonic and overall teacher wellbeing (ρ = .75 and .76)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sijing-zhou-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.